Italy, despite having merits as a server location, and adhering to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), still warrants caution due to its “Below Average” rating on the Privacy Protection Index (PPI). The country’s data retention laws under the Legislative Decree No. 109 of 2014 require telecom providers to keep user data for a set period, and its role in the 14 Eyes intelligence alliance implies potential surveillance and data sharing. Recent instances of internet censorship and unregulated website blocking further question Italy’s commitment to privacy and internet freedom. Thus, while Italy offers certain privacy protections, these must be balanced against potential risks before selecting it as a VPN server location.
Freedom of Expression and Censorship
Italy’s confrontation with freedom of expression and digital censorship is influenced in part by both regional laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and national ones like the Italian Data Protection Code. The application of these regulations to tech platforms has stirred debate over potential infringements on free speech. GDPR, although designed to protect personal data, has been cited in cases of content removal or data ‘de-listing’ from platforms, effectively altering the content available for public viewing. Critics argue this type of selective filtering may be exploited, making it an indirect form of censorship.
An incident involving the social media giant, Facebook, in 2019 is worth noting. The company blocked access to the page of CasaPound, a controversial far-right political group, citing violations of its policy against spreading hate speech. Critics claimed this move to be an instance of corporate overreach, suppressing political discourse. Supporters, however, viewed it as a necessary action to prevent the spreading of harmful ideologies online. The issue sparked a nationwide debate over the power tech companies have over online expression and the potential need for more explicit regulations regarding online speech.
The Italian legislative system has shown an active interest in regulating the digital sphere. The proposed ‘DDL Intercettazioni’ bill has been another focal point of discussion. The bill, designed to limit the diffusion of false information online, included a clause that would have required online platforms to correct any perceived incorrect news within 48 hours. Critics decried this proposal as an unacceptable infringement on freedom of speech, fearing that such a law could be misused to stifle political dissent. Supporters argued it would protect against the damage caused by misinformation. The bill has been shelved for the time being, but the debates it spurred reveal the critical tensions between freedom of expression and censorship in Italy’s internet and tech culture.
P2P, Torrenting, Streaming
Italy has made clear legislative moves that may dissuade individuals from engaging in peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing and torrenting activities. In particular, the Italian Communications Regulatory Authority (AGCOM) implemented Regulation 680/13, which came into effect in March 2014. This regulation granted AGCOM the authority to order internet service providers (ISPs) to block access to websites that are engaged in copyright infringement, without needing a preliminary judicial review.
Moreover, the infamous case of the Italian ISP Telecom Italia (now TIM) sets a noteworthy precedent. In 2008, the Court of Rome ordered Telecom Italia to block its customers’ access to The Pirate Bay, a popular torrenting site. While it’s true that these measures do aim to protect copyrighted materials, one could argue they infringe on the principles of free internet access, restricting what content users can access. This could potentially open the door to broader censorship, undermining the spirit of online autonomy. In this light, torrenting in Italy can be seen as a risky endeavor due to these legislative and judicial precedents.
The history of government surveillance in Italy’s media, journalism, and tech industries over the past three decades has been marked by significant events that raised questions about freedom of press, privacy, and the balance between national security and civil liberties. A pivotal case in point is the 2006 Telecom Italia scandal. Telecom Italia’s security department was discovered to have been conducting an unauthorized and widespread wiretapping operation that breached the privacy of thousands of individuals, including journalists, politicians, and businesspeople. The revelations ignited a national outcry about privacy protections and government accountability, casting a long shadow over the Italian telecommunication and technology sectors.
The ‘Operation Eye of the Sky’ scandal in 2010 further underscored the deep-seated concerns about government surveillance in Italy. During this operation, the Italian Postal and Communications Police allegedly intercepted the electronic communications of Italian journalists who were critical of the government. The interceptions were initially justified as measures for national security and combating organized crime, but the broad scope and targeting of journalists raised concerns about potential misuse of surveillance powers to suppress dissent and control the narrative in the media.
In recent years, there has been rising concern over the use of sophisticated surveillance tools in Italy. In 2019, the NGO Amnesty International revealed that an Italian company, Hacking Team, had sold surveillance software known as ‘Galileo’ to governments around the world. This software has been used by governments to allegedly spy on journalists, human rights defenders, and opposition politicians, raising severe concerns about the lack of control and legislation over the export of such powerful surveillance tools by Italian tech firms. These incidents highlight the ongoing struggle to balance national security with the protection of civil liberties and the free press in the technology era.
In response to concerns about digital privacy and to adhere to the European Union’s framework, Italy has implemented stringent laws to protect the digital rights of its citizens. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which was enforced across the European Union in May 2018, has been an integral part of this legislative shift. Italy’s national legislative decree no. 101/2018 harmonized the existing national Privacy Code with the provisions of the GDPR, thus enhancing the digital privacy rights of individuals. The law puts stricter controls on the handling of personal data by corporations and governments, and imposes heavy fines for non-compliance. This legislation bolstered digital privacy, offering Italian citizens more control over their personal data.
Moreover, in an effort to protect its citizens from unregulated government surveillance, Italy has reinforced the oversight of intelligence agencies. The “Democratic Oversight of the Security Services Act” (Law No. 124/2007) regulates the activities of intelligence agencies and introduces more robust parliamentary oversight. In the digital sphere, this law necessitates that agencies obtain authorization for any operation that might interfere with individual privacy rights, such as surveillance or data gathering operations. In 2017, Italy also updated its wiretapping laws with a focus on protecting journalistic sources, in response to the earlier criticisms about the misuse of surveillance for political ends. These steps highlight the Italian government’s commitment to strengthening digital privacy and safeguarding citizens’ rights in an increasingly digital world.
VPN servers in Italy: