Tag: AS18345

  • CyberGhost VPN

    CyberGhost VPN

    CyberGhost VPN was founded in 2011 in Bucharest, Romania, and initially began as a free VPN service. By the following year, it had gathered around 1.7 million users​. In 2017, a notable change occurred when Kape Technologies (then known as Crossrider) acquired CyberGhost VPN. This acquisition brought about concerns among observers due to Crossrider’s background as an ad-tech firm known for concealing spyware within its apps, which seemed to present a conflict of interest given CyberGhost’s focus on privacy. However, these concerns were largely allayed as Crossrider rebranded to Kape Technologies and positioned itself as a “privacy-first digital security software provider.” Following this, Kape Technologies went on to acquire other well-known VPN brands such as ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access, though these continue to operate independently. As of 2023, CyberGhost VPN has grown significantly with around 38 million users, making it one of the more popular VPNs available​.

    The company faced a minor hiccup in 2020 when a breach involving Typeform affected around 120 of its users. However, no evidence has emerged to suggest improper use of subscriber data by Kape, its subsidiaries, or any third parties. Despite past skepticism due to its history, CyberGhost VPN has maintained a strong reputation for privacy, continuing to provide valued services to its global user base​.

    Can I torrent with CyberGhost?

    One of the most popular reasons why people use VPNs is to encrypt their traffic and mask their IP while using P2P or BitTorrent services. CyberGhost even offers P2P servers to enhance your experience. However, right in section 8 of their Terms of Service is this alarming statement:

    We reserve the right to take appropriate measures when CyberGhost Products are being used contrary to these Terms and applicable laws, including cooperating with public or private authorities as provided by law.

    The “terms and applicable laws” are so broad that it essentially means anything illegal based on your local laws, wherever you may be. For DMCA violations generally they will just terminate your account and offer no refund. That being said, intellectual property companies rarely bother to file DMCA complaints for IPs associated with VPNs, especially when that company is registered outside of the United States.

    What services are accessible when connected to CyberGhost?

    ServiceBlocked / Restricted
    Amazon PrimeAccessible for browsing; streaming blocked
    NetflixAccessible for browsing; streaming blocked
    SpotifyAccessible; CAPTCHA during registration
    PandoraAccessible
    YouTube MusicAccessible
    HuluAccessible
    Disney+Accessible; no restrictions
    Google SearchCaptcha
    ChatGPTSome IPs blocked
    YouTubeAccessible

    Data collection

    Like almost every VPN, CyberGhost does collect some maintenance-related data, but it claims to not log your server location choices, your total amount of data transferred nor your connection timestamps. As with any VPN, it’s nearly impossible to independently verify the company’s no-logs claim. Even so, CyberGhost does log certain user hardware data in what is likely a bid to enforce the company’s limit of seven simultaneous connections per account. 

    According to the spokesperson CNET spoke to in August of 2019, CyberGhost does have the ability to help law enforcement by activating a limited user-tracking feature.  

    “The only way to do it is if that user is still in the system and if the law enforcement knows the IP and could provide also a warrant to track that IP,” the spokesperson said. “We can activate a special feature like a logging feature for that IP, but we have that ability to prevent malicious actions when using our service. But only if that user is still active and we have proof of what exactly is wrong, what IP he is using, and so on. So we’ve got to bring that in order to activate that, to be sure we don’t activate it on a regular user. Otherwise, we can not help any law enforcement company.” 

    In 2016, however, CyberGhost was called to the carpet by ProPrivacy when the company was discovered to be quietly requesting potentially dangerous, root-level access to customers’ computers — a function the software hasn’t included for about three years now. The service was also caught logging the unique identifiers of each of its user’s computers. Similarly, other reviewers have also expressed wariness after CyberGhost appeared to remove some threads from its forum which may have detailed a critical 2016 malfunction and potentially revealed log-keeping practices within its free proxy service.

    Speaking of revelations, in March 2019, CyberGhost took a small hit when the customer-survey company it contracted, Typeform, was breached. The company said 120 email addresses and 14 CyberGhost usernames — but no passwords — were included in the two forms involved in the compromised data. 

    The bigger concern for me is that CyberGhost still uses a method of ad-blocking that’s considered at best ineffective and at worst insecure. Most VPNs block ads by filtering out requests from websites identified as suspicious. Not CyberGhost. The company instead uses a method which inspects and modifies — rather than filters out — those requests. The method is twice as risky and only half effective since it only works on sites with an HTTP URL and not those with HTTPS. 

    CNET asked Beyel in June this year about this method of ad-blocking and the criticism it’s received. 

    “We know this is not very effective. That’s why we’re already working on a better solution which is working on the process,” he said. “We need to completely move this kind of technology on the client side because in the browser you can, of course, do that.” 

    In its suite of features, however, CyberGhost does offer an option (enabled by default in its MacOS client) which forces your browser to redirect away from sites not secured by HTTPS. 

    Beyel also said that CyberGhost will be releasing a new suite of privacy modules in the coming weeks which go beyond its VPN to include tools for optimizing your computer and preventing vulnerable apps from affecting your privacy.[2]

    See also:

  • Private Internet Access

    Private Internet Access

    Private Internet Access (commonly known as PIA) is a capable VPN provider, now owned by Kape, which also owns CyberGhost, ZenMate and ExpressVPN.

    PIA has servers available in just about every single state in America, which is great if you want to encrypt and protect your connection but don’t want to get locked out your account for suspicious activity. Choosing a server in a remote country for instance can have some benefits but it is not always the most practical choice.

    Privacy Policy

    PIA’s privacy policy is a classic example of a company trying to paint itself in the best possible light regarding privacy and legal compliance. They talk a big game about scrutinizing legal requests and standing up for user privacy, emphasizing their commitment to the “spirit” and “letter” of the law. This is meant to reassure you, the user, that they’re on your side, ready to shield your data from the prying eyes of the law—unless absolutely necessary of course.

    But here’s the rub: when push comes to shove, the majority of companies, especially those anchored in the U.S., have a breaking point. The notion of a corporate David going toe-to-toe with the Goliath that is the federal government and emerging unscathed is, frankly, more fairy tale than fact. It’s not just about being bullied into submission; it’s about survival. Companies operate under the jurisdiction of local and federal laws, and while they might resist or push back on requests initially, the potential consequences of outright defiance—legal battles, hefty fines, or worse—make compliance the path of least resistance.

    What often goes unsaid in these polished statements is the scale and intensity of pressure a company can face behind closed doors. Yes, they might question or attempt to narrow down overly broad subpoenas, but these are tactical moves within a game where the house always wins. The promise to not participate with unconstitutional or illegal requests is noble but navigating the complex web of legal interpretations and potential repercussions makes this a tightrope walk at best.

    And let’s not gloss over the part where they say they’ll give users a chance to object to disclosures “when it is possible and a valid option.” That’s a lot of leeway packed into a few words, suggesting that this opportunity is more of an exception than a rule.

    In essence, while the statement aims to reassure you of the company’s steadfastness in protecting your privacy, the reality is often shaped by legal and political pressures that can turn those assurances into well-intentioned but ultimately hollow promises.

    Terms of Service

    As far as Terms of Service go, PIA’s is boilerplate industry standard. If you violate law they reserve the right to terminate your service. They don’t include any of the vague terms and phrases like some other providers due like “inappropriate conduct”.

    You must conduct yourself in a way that complies with law and would not violate these rules of conduct.

    Log Policy

    In the book Resistance, Liberation Technology and Human Rights in the Digital Age author Giovanni Ziccardi shares this response from Private Internet Access:

    “We absolutely do not maintain any VPN logs of any kind. We utilize shared IP addresses rather than dynamic or static IPs, so it is not possible to match a user to an external IP. These are some of the many solutions we have implemented to enable the strongest levels of anonymity amongst VPN services. Further, we would like to encourage our users to use an anonymous e-mail and pay with Bitcoins to ensure even higher levels of anonymity should it be required.” Q2: “Our company currently operates out of the United States with gigabit gateways in the US, Canada, UK, Switzerland, and the Netherlands.

    We chose the US, since it is one of the only countries without a mandatory data retention law. We will not share any information with third parties without a valid
    court order. With that said, it is impossible to match a user to any activity on our system since we utilize shared IPs and maintain absolutely no logs.”

    Torrenting

    Private Internet Access (PIA) beats around the bush when it comes to using their VPN services for BitTorrent. While their terms of service explicitly prohibit copyright infringement, their Frequently Asked Questions page delicately navigates the subject of torrenting. PIA suggests that utilizing their VPN can enhance online privacy and prevent ISPs from potentially labeling a user’s activities as suspicious. However, this stance is somewhat disingenuous, as ISPs generally do not actively monitor their customers’ web traffic. The primary concern with torrenting, particularly in the context of piracy, is the risk of receiving DMCA takedown notices, which is a more direct consequence of copyright violation than mere ISP scrutiny.

    Torrenting with PIA is a breeze, however. After I connected to a Canadian server about 1,200 miles away I fired up QBitorrent and within seconds was connectable. I was able to achieve speeds of 10Mbps down and 1.4Mbps up. Not too shabby. It’s important to remember that torrenting is a completely subjective experience and these results are only indicative of my experience. Yours may differ wildly.

    According to my research, PIA VPN predominantly uses CDNext, GTT, and M247 servers depending on where you are connecting to.

    Use of virtual servers

    While it’s not uncommon for VPN providers to use location virtualization, some do see it as dishonest and another deceitful marketing technique. During our testing, we discovered that PIA does in fact use location virtualization. For instance, 100% of the servers advertised as being in the Philippines were actually located in Singapore.

    IP                Advertised Country   Actual Country  ISP    ASN      
    188.214.125.131   Philippines          Singapore       M247   AS9009	

    ASN Diversity

    In the realm of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), diversity is a key indicator of network resilience. A significant measure of this diversity can be evaluated using the Shannon Diversity Index (SDI), a concept borrowed from ecology to measure the biodiversity in a given community. In the context of VPNs, the SDI offers a quantitative assessment of the diversity of Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) among VPN servers. Theoretically, a higher SDI correlates with increased network diversity, indicating a more resilient network structure less prone to single-point failures.

    An examination of Private Internet Access (PIA), with its SDI value of 1.8, reveals a comparatively lower network diversity in relation to other VPNs. For instance, Windscribe, Surfshark, and NordVPN have reported SDI values of 3.6, 2.88, and 2.75 respectively. This suggests a potential susceptibility in PIA’s network to failures or targeted attacks, owing to its relatively less diverse network.

    However, it is crucial to emphasize that SDI, while informative, is not the sole determinant of network performance and resilience. Several other factors, including the choice of Internet Service Providers (ISPs), geographical server distribution, total network capacity, and VPN service management practices significantly influence a VPN’s overall performance. Thus, while PIA’s SDI value may not place it at the pinnacle of network diversity, it is important to consider the holistic context when evaluating VPN performance and resilience.

    See also: